Quick Answer. Juniper Square vs Passthrough
Juniper Square and Passthrough both help private fund managers streamline investor-related workflows, but they're designed around different areas of the private markets lifecycle. Juniper Square is a broader private markets platform combining investor management, fundraising, investor onboarding, reporting, portals, CRM capabilities, and fund administration services. Passthrough takes a more specialized approach, focused primarily on investor onboarding, electronic subscription documents, and financial crime compliance, designed to work alongside existing fund administrators, portals, and CRMs rather than replace them.
Key Takeaways
  • The biggest difference between the two platforms is scope, a broad operating platform versus a specialized onboarding and compliance layer
  • Juniper Square provides its own investor portal, CRM, and fund administration, Passthrough integrates with existing systems rather than replacing them
  • Both platforms support KYC and AML, but Passthrough makes financial crime compliance a central, dedicated product capability
  • Many fund managers use both platforms together through integrations rather than choosing one exclusively
  • The right choice depends on whether a fund manager wants a centralized operating environment or wants to keep an existing tech stack while improving onboarding specifically

Juniper Square and Passthrough both help private fund managers streamline investor-related workflows, but they are designed around different areas of the private markets lifecycle. The right choice depends largely on whether a fund manager needs a broader private markets operating platform or a specialized investor onboarding and compliance solution.

Juniper Square vs Passthrough at a Glance

FeatureJuniper SquarePassthrough
Investor onboardingYesYes
Investor portalYesNo
Fund administrationYesNo, works with administrators
Fund accountingYesNo
Capital calls and distributionsYesNot a core platform function
Best suited forBroader private-market operationsInvestor onboarding and compliance

The feature comparison reflects the companies' current product positioning and published documentation, and can change as either platform evolves, confirm current capabilities directly with each provider.

What Is Juniper Square?

Juniper Square is a private markets technology and fund administration platform designed for general partners and investment firms, bringing together investor management, fundraising, investor onboarding, reporting, investor portals, CRM, fund accounting, fund administration, data rooms, capital calls, and distributions. Its fund administration offering also combines technology with professional services covering fund accounting, treasury, investor services, and reporting, making it particularly relevant for firms looking for a more comprehensive operating environment rather than a single-purpose onboarding tool.

What Is Passthrough?

Passthrough is a private markets platform focused primarily on investor onboarding and financial crime compliance, electronic subscription documents, KYC, AML, investor data collection, and compliance workflows. Passthrough states that it can connect investor onboarding with existing CRMs, investor portals, and data rooms, allowing fund managers to retain their existing technology stack while automating the subscription process. The company positions itself as specializing in investor onboarding and KYC/AML rather than serving as an all-in-one investor portal, data room, or fund administration platform.

Investor Onboarding

Juniper Square integrates onboarding into a broader investor management environment, supporting digital subscriptions, AML/KYC, side letters, and investor reporting. Passthrough focuses more narrowly on making subscription document completion and investor onboarding efficient, allowing managers to use their own subscription documents and create digital workflows around them, with real-time visibility into fundraising progress. For firms wanting a broader platform, Juniper Square offers more surrounding functionality, for firms primarily trying to improve subscription and onboarding specifically, Passthrough's specialization may be attractive.

KYC and AML

Both platforms support KYC and AML workflows, but Passthrough makes financial crime compliance a central part of its offering, providing these workflows alongside electronic subscription documents and managed compliance services. Juniper Square incorporates AML/KYC into its broader investor services offering covering onboarding, treasury, reporting, and capital events. The distinction is primarily one of product scope, Juniper Square treats KYC/AML as part of a broader platform, Passthrough treats it as a central product capability.

Investor Portal

This is one of the clearest differences between the platforms. Juniper Square provides an investor portal where LPs can access investment information, documents, reports, and data rooms. Passthrough does not provide its own LP portal or data room as part of its core product, instead integrating with existing portals, data rooms, and CRMs, allowing fund managers to choose separate systems for different functions. Choose Juniper Square if an integrated investor portal is important, choose Passthrough if you already have a portal or data room and primarily need stronger onboarding infrastructure.

Fund Administration

Juniper Square has a dedicated fund administration offering covering accounting, investor services, treasury, and reporting. Passthrough does not position itself as a fund administrator replacement, instead providing onboarding and compliance technology that fund administrators and other service providers can use. If a manager needs fund accounting, investor reporting, capital event management, and administration support in one place, Juniper Square offers a broader set of capabilities, if the fund already has an administrator and needs to improve subscription and compliance workflows specifically, Passthrough can fit into that existing setup.

Integrations

Passthrough has built its product around integration with other systems, connecting investor onboarding data with existing CRMs, portals, and data rooms to reduce duplicate data entry. Juniper Square also supports integrations and APIs, while its broader platform attempts to centralize more workflows within its own environment. Passthrough functions as a specialized onboarding layer that connects to other systems, Juniper Square functions as a broader operating platform with integrated applications and external integrations.

Investor Experience

Passthrough emphasizes a digital-first onboarding experience and reports an average completion time of around 20 minutes for a new investor and around two minutes for a returning investor. Juniper Square approaches investor experience more broadly through its portal, reporting, onboarding, and communications, allowing investors to access investment information, documents, and reports over the course of the relationship. Passthrough is particularly focused on the initial onboarding experience, Juniper Square extends the investor relationship across a broader portion of the investment lifecycle.

Which Is Better for Fund Managers?

There is no universal winner because the platforms address different needs. Juniper Square may be a better fit for firms that need fund administration, fund accounting, investor reporting, an investor portal, CRM, and a connected private markets platform. Passthrough may be a better fit for firms that need digital subscription documents, faster investor onboarding, dedicated KYC/AML workflows, and integration with an existing CRM, portal, or fund administrator, without wanting to replace their existing technology stack.

The Core Question: Platform or Specialized Layer?

The biggest difference is scope. Juniper Square attempts to connect a large portion of the private investment lifecycle within one platform, Passthrough deliberately focuses on a narrower problem, making investor onboarding and financial crime compliance more efficient. The decision should start with a simple question, do you need a broader private markets operating platform, or do you primarily need specialized investor onboarding and compliance technology? If the former, Juniper Square may be the more comprehensive option, if the latter, Passthrough's specialized approach may be more appropriate.

Final Verdict

Juniper Square and Passthrough are not direct substitutes in every situation. Juniper Square is a broader private markets platform combining technology and fund administration services across investor management, fundraising, reporting, accounting, and communications. Passthrough is more specialized, focusing on digital subscription documents, investor onboarding, and financial crime compliance while integrating with other systems. The best choice ultimately depends on the fund's operational model, existing systems, investor onboarding requirements, and how much of the investment lifecycle the manager wants to manage through a single platform.

Trust and Transparency: Contact the Editorial Team Privacy Policy

Related Resources

Carta Investor Hub vs InvestNext. Platform comparison
KYC for investment funds. Requirements and process
Institutional-grade LP portal. What emerging managers need

Authoritative Resources

Juniper Square. Official Platform Site
Primary source for current Juniper Square features and pricing
Passthrough. Official Platform Site
Primary source for current Passthrough features and pricing
SEC. Regulation D Overview
Compliance framework underlying subscription documents
SEC. Accredited Investor Definition
Eligibility criteria verified during onboarding
FinCEN. KYC and AML Requirements
Compliance framework both platforms help support
IRS. Schedule K1 (Form 1065)
Tax reporting both platforms can help support
ILPA. Reporting and Governance Standards
Institutional expectations for investor reporting
AICPA. Audit and Assurance Standards
Standards underlying fund administration and accounting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Juniper Square and Passthrough?
Juniper Square is generally described as a broader investment management platform and CRM managing investors across a fund's lifecycle. Passthrough is generally a more specialized tool focused on investor onboarding, automating subscription documents and KYC/AML compliance checks.
Can Passthrough replace Juniper Square?
Generally no, Passthrough does not replace Juniper Square's broader feature set, it generally lacks a dedicated investor portal, CRM tracking, and distribution waterfall calculations. Many fund managers use both platforms together through integrations.
Which platform is better for real estate syndicators?
Juniper Square has strong adoption among real estate sponsors and generally supports property performance metrics and complex distribution waterfalls, though it is positioned as a broader private markets platform rather than a tool built exclusively for real estate.
Which platform is better for venture capital and private equity?
Passthrough is commonly used by VC and PE funds prioritizing efficient onboarding of large investor counts. Juniper Square also serves private equity managers, though its broader feature set may feel like more than an early-stage VC fund needs.
How do they handle automated subscription documents?
Juniper Square generally digitizes subscription documents into a standard electronic signature workflow. Passthrough generally uses dynamic, conditional questionnaires that can adapt the form based on factors such as the investor's entity type.
Do these platforms offer fund administration services?
Juniper Square generally offers in-house fund administration services, including dedicated accounting support alongside its software. Passthrough generally focuses on technology and integrates with third-party fund administrators rather than providing administration services itself.
How do they handle KYC and AML?
Passthrough generally features deeply integrated automated compliance checks that can flag missing or incorrect identity details during onboarding. Juniper Square generally includes KYC and AML checks as part of its broader investor setup workflow.
Can Passthrough integrate with existing software?
Generally yes, Passthrough is built to integrate with existing systems and can generally pass completed investor data into CRMs or standalone investor portals.
Which platform is easier for an investor to use?
Passthrough generally emphasizes a faster onboarding experience, with the company citing an average completion time around 20 minutes for new investors. Juniper Square's portal is generally straightforward for ongoing access, though initial onboarding can take longer given its broader scope.
How does the pricing compare?
Juniper Square is generally priced as an enterprise software and services offering, with costs commonly scaling based on assets under management or total investor count. Passthrough generally scales pricing based on fund volume or metrics tied to closing activity. Current pricing should be confirmed directly with each provider.

Key Takeaways

  • Juniper Square and Passthrough are not direct substitutes in every situation, they address different scopes of the private fund operating stack.
  • Juniper Square offers a broader, connected private markets operating platform, investor management, fundraising, reporting, accounting, and communications.
  • Passthrough offers a more specialized investor onboarding and KYC/AML solution designed to work with an existing technology stack.
  • The best choice depends on the fund's operational model, existing systems, and how much of the investment lifecycle the manager wants to manage through a single platform.